9/28/17

Putin and Sun Tzu

“He who knows when he can fight and when he cannot, will be victorious.”
“The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.”
“Be extremely subtle, even to the point of formlessness. Be extremely mysterious, even to the point of soundlessness. Thereby you can be the director of the opponent’s fate.”

--Chinese philosopher of war Sun Tzu

An accumulating mass of information suggests to me—and I hope I am wrong about this—that Vladimir Putin has launched a war against the United States and its European and other allies (the “West”). I also think that Vladimir Putin is a student of Sun Tzu, and has applied strategies like those above.
Whether Putin’s motive is simply a hatred for and desire to destroy the democracies that humiliated the Soviet Union, the reassembly of most if not all of Russia’s empire, or something else I don’t know. Certainly, the destruction of the West is part of whatever he seeks.
His method of waging this war seems reasonably clear. Russia is militarily and financially no match for the US and NATO. But he perceives that the West is rich and complacent, and concludes that, reminiscent of German Jews facing the rise of Hitler in the 30s, we are loathe to jeopardize our comfort by taking decisive but extremely costly self-protective action so long as his threat remains, shall we say, “soundless,” “formless” and “mysterious.”
Putin “knows when he can fight and when he cannot.” Russia lacks the financial strength to mount a powerful military, but information technology now provides a much less expensive as well as “mysterious” offensive force: cyberwarfare. Not only is it cheap and hard to detect, but extensive dependence on the internet and other computer-controlled infrastructure networks makes the West exceedingly vulnerable to it. And with our uncensored social media and belief in freedom of expression, we have forged weapons for our own destruction.  
So Putin has for several years been developing and honing perhaps the world’s most aggressive and effective cyberwarfare capability. This has stolen sensitive information from the most carefully secured sites, locked up and ransomed expensively protected computer systems, disrupted vital communications and other infrastructures, and swarmed social media like Twitter and Facebook with vast clouds of false, scurrilous messages designed to enrage people, inspire hatred or fear, set communities against each other or themselves, and impugn politicians Putin deems dangerous. His efforts may well have thrown the US Presidency to Donald Trump, and provided crucial support to such disruptive causes as Brexit, Kurdish independence, Catalan secession from Spain, and the 5 Star movement in Italy, among others.    

While Putin uses cyberwarfare against the West “to subdue the enemy without fighting,” he has also initiated small and camouflaged military invasions of Russian neighbors like Georgia, the Crimea, Ukraine, and Latvia. Nothing so far is clear enough to shatter our complacency and mobilize our overwhelmingly stronger military, but still valuable land grabs and useful threats to other neighbors. These actions, along with a cyberwar effort whose extent is not yet fully apparent, are the evidence for my concern that, without our knowing it, Mr. Putin has launched a deadly war against the US and its allies.

9/5/17

The Joy of War

Articles trying to explain terrorism rarely mention how joyous and exciting the idea of going to war can be, particularly to the young, angry, and inexperienced. As the World War I critic Randolph Bourne wrote, “War is the health of the state.”[1]

War, or at least the idea of it, is very enjoyable for many people. You get to dress up in nifty uniforms that make you look great. You receive the praise and admiration of civilians—these days, they even applaud you in airports and other public places. And meanwhile, you’re preparing to play the most basic and beloved type of game: competing against tough opponents. War is its ultimate expression.
Everyone realizes, deep down, that war is hell. But for the young and inexperienced, who naturally feel invulnerable, war and the propaganda that always precedes and accompanies it makes fighting it seem a noble sacrifice for the sake of honorable ideas. You fight to defeat vile and hateful enemies; selflessly protect the innocent; and bravely defend Our Way of Life, Our Religion, our God, the Homeland. Preparing for and fighting war can mold you into a strong, enduring, brave, skillful and admired adult.

More important than we like to acknowledge in this calculus is sadism. The history of warfare (and anything else that allows the unaccountable use of force against others), is replete with wanton cruelty.  These situations may well attract some who have cruel and angry impulses, but they also arouse such feelings in many others. Wars validate such behavior by inspiring fear and hatred of the enemies and providing many apparently legitimate opportunities to behave badly. They may even bring social approval for bad actions, seeing them as just punishment for enemies expected to do the same or worse.

Americans are perhaps especially susceptible to the powerful psychological attractions of the idea of war because, unlike most other countries, we have not experienced it on our soil since the Civil War ended more than 150 years ago. Nor, have many young Americans fought in recent wars, lengthy as they have been. Very few Americans, therefore, have personally experienced the dire consequences of fighting war.

Inexperience also afflicts the young of many other countries, many of whom suffer a degree of hopelessness and despair about their futures that most Americans escape. To some of them, the siren call of jihad sings of noble sacrifice in an honorable cause, and offers an approved outlet for frustration and rage. To defeat terrorism, I think we need to fashion programs in light of these feelings.




[1] As quoted in Franklin Foer, “Why Liberalism Disappoints,” The Atlantic (September 2017), p. 47